Essential oil safety-The known and the unknown.
By Martin WattFor many years a large volume of scientific information has been available on the safety of essential oils. Many essential oils have been used for over 100 years as ingredients of: medicines, food, drink, perfumes, cosmetics, soaps, detergents, candles, industrial applications, etc. Due to this widespread use, various authorities around the world, have investigated the safety of the oils in most of their commonest applications.
Sources of information.
How do these organisations assess the safety or otherwise of essential oils? Well they have many sources of information to draw on, or if they are uncertain, they will commission independent studies. Many essential oils were listed in several National pharmacopoeias around the turn of the Century because they were commonly used in medicinal preparations. However, subsequently a significant amount of scientific investigations have been undertaken, particularly in many universities around the world. Some of this work has been co-ordinated for regulatory authorities, and some experiments simply for independent academic studies.
The best source of safety information of relevance in aromatherapy is the R.I.F.M. (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials) and their sister organisation the I.F.R.A. (International Fragrance Research Association). These organisations collect data in a number of ways: they gather scientific information and assess it, member companies report adverse reactions to fragrance materials to them, and if necessary, they in turn circulate member companies with warning notices. Finally, they have commissioned significant research evaluations of fragrance materials. For well over 30 years, these organisations have published their findings, in an extensive series of monographs on essential oil safety in the journal- Food and Chemicals Toxicity.
The fragrance trade organisations do sterling work gathering data from adverse reactions reports and from testing the material in clinics around the world. The aromatherapy trade has no such system to monitor adverse effects of raw materials.
Under UK and EEC law, it is an offence to place any product on the market if known hazards may be associated with misuse or inappropriate use of the product. That is unless 'appropriate warnings' are attached to the product. Despite that, many traders here do still ignore this important piece of consumer protection legislation. 'Appropriate warnings' is the most important issue. There is nothing wrong with selling many of our most hazardous oils for non-contact uses, i.e. in fragrance heaters, pot pourii, candles, etc. However, it is unscrupulous to not warn people that these products should not be applied to the skin, and also probably illegal.
The legal position of anyone that uses oils with known dangers, in a professional setting, such as in an aromatherapy treatment, requires examination. If someone used such a substance, and their client suffered a side effect as a result. Such a client would have an extremely powerful legal case to argue. Where a major research organisation such as RIFM, has advised the large fragrance companies against the use of such materials for many years, then in such circumstances, a court might deem it unreasonable, for a qualified aromatherapist to use the material in an 'inappropriate manner'. Here I am particularly thinking about oils like expressed bergamot, where if used in a health club, before someone goes under the sun bed, could cause a very severe skin reaction.
It is also highly likely, that if the therapist did this, then their insurance company would refuse to stand by them and cover any subsequent damages awarded.
Banned or restricted oils.
Another oil that is 'effectively' banned in cosmetic products is sassafras oil. By 'effectively' banned this is because the E.E.C. only permit safrol in products at below at 100 ppm. Since raw sassafras oil contains about 870,000 p.p.m. of safrole, this means that in aromatherapy you would have great difficulty in diluting the oil to a safe and LEGAL level of use.
Countries within the European Community vary considerably in which essential oils can or can't be sold, and how they may be used. However, once the oil is introduced to a product formulation, the laws are now almost standardised.
Miscellaneous claimed adverse effects.
The facts are that most common essential oils are permitted food flavourings. If there were the slightest evidence that using essential oils externally was any threat to the health of a foetus, then the oils concerned would have been restricted by legislation long ago.
If someone was suffering from severe morning sickness early on in pregnancy, then the smell of something like peppermint or spearmint oil may well subdue the nausea. In such a case of constant vomiting, the implanted foetus is far more likely to be dislodged by the traumatic muscular contractions of the uterus, than from the effects of the inhalation of ANY essential oils.
The birch and wintergreen oils are best avoided during pregnancy. This is because indications are that the main chemical is readily absorbed by the skin. High levels of this in the bloodstream are not desirable in pregnancy.
Clary sage is perfectly safe in a normal pregnancy, but should perhaps be avoided by anyone with a history of early miscarriages.
The main contra-indication of essential oils use during pregnancy is the heightened chance of causing skin irritation. It is quite common in late pregnancy for the skin to become very itchy and sometimes inflamed. In such circumstances essential oils in massage or the bath might make the condition worse.
Epilepsy. There is no sound scientific evidence that any particular essential oils can trigger an epileptic incident. In fact it is well documented that any powerful smell can initiate such an attack. Therefore the only advice may be avoid the pungent oils like camphor, eucalyptus, tea tree, rosemary, etc. On the other hand, some trials have indicated that the traditionally relaxing oils can substantially reduce the incidence of attacks.
High or low blood pressure. There have been no scientifically verified trials published, following the external application of oils on humans, where blood pressure has been monitored. There are no proven cases, of anyone who has suffered ill effects from an escalation of blood pressure caused by aromatherapy. Indeed the opposite is likely, which is that a nice relaxing massage, or the use of the oils as room fragrance, will decrease a blood pressure that is high due to stress.
Sell by, or use by dates.
The use of little known 'chemotypes' and completely untested essential oils.
Many of the 'untested' oils are said by some people to have been "used traditionally". However, when this statement is carefully checked this is often found in error. The reason is that what has been used traditionally is the HERB not the oil. Herbal preparations contain totally different chemicals, with often totally different actions, to those occurring in a distilled oil from the same plant. Therefore such so called 'traditional' uses may not have any basis in fact.
There are some compounds occurring in plant oils that can cause sensitisation reactions when only occurring at a few parts per million. Therefore chemical analysis of the major compounds occurring in the oil can give absolutely no guide as to its safety. Examining the major chemicals in an oil to judge efficacy and safety is a major error, but forms a major part of the teachings of certain aromatherapy teachers. This problem largely originates from certain well known French therapists. If it were possible to judge safety by such means., then large organisations specialising in safety would not need to have spent millions on animal and human trials.
How is testing done.
Skin adverse effects. Some of these tests were done on animals, but the final testing was on humans. These kind of tests are still conducted on volunteer panels of humans. In addition specialist dermatology clinics around the world, test people they think may be allergic to fragrance compounds, as part of their routine testing procedures. These results are often published in International dermatology journals and add to the wealth of knowledge on the side effects of essential oils.
Some essential oils which you should be cautious about.
If anyone sees such oils on open sale without appropriate warnings, you should tell the vendor that the oils are not safe, or the safety is unknown. Often they may not know, and may have relied for their knowledge entirely on the popular aromatherapy novels, or on some of the appallingly poor training courses around.
Much greater detail on safety is available in the publications "Plant aromatics" by Martin Watt. For details send an A5 S.A.E. to: M. Watt, 7, Elm Court Park, Blackmore, CM4 OSE. Some essential oil distributors also stock these publications.
This page hosted by Graham Sorenson
The Guide to Aromatherapy